What’s New?

Columbia University Antisemitism Settlement: DEI is Alive

by Jennifer Shaw | | January 5, 2026

The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission has opened the claims process for a $21 million class settlement with Columbia University arising from allegations of antisemitic harassment and retaliation against employees.

Eligible current and former employees—including student employees—who worked at the University between October 7, 2023, and July 23, 2025, and who believe they experienced mistreatment based on Jewish faith, Jewish ancestry, or Israeli national origin, may now submit claims. The claims process began in December 2025.

Why the Settlement Matters

This settlement is a clear reminder that Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964—which prohibits discrimination and harassment based on religion, race, ethnicity, and national origin—applies fully to all employers, including universities.

Harassment violates federal law when it is severe or pervasive enough to create a hostile work environment. The EEOC’s investigation stemmed from a Commissioner’s Charge filed in June 2024 and resolved without an admission of liability. Even so, the size of the settlement underscores the seriousness of the allegations and the risks employers face when protected-class complaints are not effectively addressed.

So What?

This case reinforces a critical point: DEI is not merely cultural—it is grounded in enforceable federal civil rights law.

Employers sometimes view DEI efforts as driven by shifting public sentiment. Federal enforcement actions tell a different story. When harassment tied to religion or national origin is ignored, mishandled, or minimized, employers face real legal exposure and substantial financial risk. The EEOC continues to enforce these obligations aggressively.

HR Takeaways

  • Review anti-harassment policies to ensure religion, ancestry, and national origin are clearly covered
  • Confirm reporting systems are accessible and trusted, and that retaliation is expressly prohibited
  • Train managers to recognize and escalate faith- and identity-based complaints
  • Document investigations carefully to demonstrate compliance and consistency
  • Do not assume enforcement has softened, regardless of changes in DEI rhetoric

Final Thoughts

The Columbia settlement is a reminder that inclusive workplaces are not just aspirational—they are a legal requirement. EEOC enforcement confirms that DEI remains alive, not as a slogan, but as an enforceable standard under federal law.

For employers, the takeaway is simple: strong policies, prompt investigations, and engaged leadership remain essential risk-management tools.

About Shaw Law Group

At Shaw Law Group, we do more than practice employment law—we partner with employers to build compliant, respectful, and productive workplaces. From day-to-day advice and counsel to impartial workplace investigations, proactive HR audits, dynamic training programs, and sensitive pre-litigation matters, our experienced team helps clients stay ahead of the curve—and out of court.

author avatar
Jennifer Shaw Founder
Jennifer Shaw is the founder of Shaw Law Group, and a 2019 recipient of the Sacramento Business Journal’s “Women Who Mean Business” award. A well-respected expert in employment law for more than 25 years, employers regularly rely on Jennifer to counsel them on a broad range of employment law issues. Jennifer’s practical advice covers subjects such as wage-hour compliance, anti-discrimination and harassment policies and procedures, reasonable accommodation/leave of absence issues, and hiring/separation processes. She is a trusted advisor to in-house counsel, HR professionals, and leadership across a broad spectrum of public sector and private sector employers.
Never Miss a Post
Please enter all required fields Click to hide
Correct invalid entries Click to hide
X